PainScience.com Sensible advice for aches, pains & injuries
 
 

microblog

“Movement quality” still does not clearly predict injury

Paul Ingraham ARCHIVEDMicroblog posts are archived and rarely updated. In contrast, most long-form articles on PainScience.com are updated regularly over the years.

Fresh science! New review of 17 “mostly low quality” studies of the relationship between leg injuries and movement quality shows “inconsistent evidence.” In other words, we have no idea if we can tell who’s going to get leghurt based on screening people for quality-of-movement trouble, e.g. Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS).

I’m always torn about how to interpret these garbage-in, garbage-out reviews: they’re officially inconclusive, because they are obviously reviewing studies that just weren’t designed to answer the damn question. But realistically… they are really just totally damning, because if a bunch of high-bias-risk studies can’t demonstrate the link the researchers are undoubtedly fishing for, then it almost certainly ain’t there. Seriously, how many crappy little studies showing not much do we need before it’s safe to assume that there’s no beef? 4? 7? 17?

This is the MICROBLOG: small posts about interesting stuff that comes up while I’m updating & upgrading dozens of featured articles on PainScience.com. Follow along on Twitter, Facebook, or RSS. Sorry, no email subscription option at this time, but it’s in the works.