PainSci summary of Bolgla 2006?This page is one of thousands in the PainScience.com bibliography. It is not a general article: it is focused on a single scientific paper, and it may provide only just enough context for the summary to make sense. Links to other papers and more general information are provided at the bottom of the page, as often as possible.
This research team studied a group of 20 women with patellofemoral pain syndrome, and 20 healthy people for comparison. They emphasize that they did not find a causal relationship and only “a moderate association” between pain and the strength of external rotation. They also identified a moderate association between pain and with some increased EMG (electrical activity) in a key hip muscle, the gluteus medius, and the vastus medialis.
I will emphasize that these researchers reported no difference at all in hip abduction (gluteus medius) strength, which is the muscle that is of the greatest interest in the scientific controversy about hip strength and running injuries.
~ Paul Ingraham
original abstract†Abstracts here may not perfectly match originals, for a variety of technical and practical reasons. Some abstacts are truncated for my purposes here, if they are particularly long-winded and unhelpful. I occasionally add clarifying notes. And I make some minor corrections.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To determine differences in hip and knee strength, EMG activity, and kinematics in subjects diagnosed with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).
SUBJECTS: Twenty females diagnosed with PFPS and 20 age-matched controls.
MATERIALS/METHODS: Subjects completed a 10-cm visual analogue pain scale. Surface electrodes were donned to the gluteus medius (GM), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus lateralis (VL) of the symptomatic lower extremity for PFPS subjects and the right lower extremity for controls. Subjects performed 3 repetitions of isometric hip abduction, hip external rotation (HER), and knee extension against a hand-held dynamometer. EMG data were also simultaneously collected to determine the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) for each muscle. Reflective markers were then placed on each subject prior to the stair-stepping task. Prior to testing, subjects practiced ascending and descending 2 20-cm high steps (lifting and lowering the body with the test extremity). They performed 5 test repetitions. Kinematic data were sampled at 60 Hz and low pass filtered at 6 Hz. EMG data were amplified, band pass filtered from 20-500 Hz, and sampled at 960 Hz with video data. Seven control subjects were retested within 1 week to establish reliability. Average isometric torque generated for each strength test was normalized to height and weight. Hip adduction, internal rotation, and knee valgus angles during stair descent were ensemble averaged. GM, VM, and VL EMG activity during stair descent were ensemble averaged and expressed as a percent MVIC. Average onset timing differences between the GM and vasti muscles at the beginning of stair descent were also determined. Mann-Whitney U tests identified group differences. Spearman rho coefficients quantified associations between pain and all variables.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients exceeded .78. PFPS subjects generated less muscle torque (P<.02) but greater EMG activity (P<.02) during stair ascent that controls. No differences existed for kinematic and onset timing variables. A moderate association existed between pain and HER strength (r = -0.62) and GM (r = 0.56) and VM (r = 0.64) EMG activity during stair descent.
CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary rehabilitation for PFPS patients has focused on quadriceps strengthening. Results from this study inferred that hip weakness was related to PFPS as evidenced by a stronger association between pain and HER strength and significant GM activity during stair descent. However, we were unable to determine if hip weakness was a cause or a result from PFPS. Our results showed no kinematic differences, which may have resulted from difficulty measuring transverse and frontal plane motion. EMG onset timing differences between the GM and vasti muscles were not found, implying that delayed VM activity was not a significant factor.
These two articles on PainScience.com cite Bolgla 2006 as a source:
- PS Save Yourself from IT Band Syndrome! — All your treatment options for Iliotibial Band Syndrome reviewed in great detail, with clear explanations of recent scientific research supporting every key point
- PS Does Hip Strengthening Work for IT Band Syndrome? — The popular “weak hips” theory is itself weak
This page is part of the PainScience BIBLIOGRAPHY, which contains plain language summaries of thousands of scientific papers & others sources. It’s like a highly specialized blog. A few highlights:
- A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: the case of felt power. Gronau 2017 Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology.
- Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Paige 2017 JAMA.
- Incidence of Spontaneous Resorption of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis. Zhong 2017 Pain Physician.
- How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Soligard 2016 Br J Sports Med.
- Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine: a three-armed, single-blinded, placebo, randomized controlled trial. Chaibi 2016 Eur J Neurol.