I am a science writer and a former Registered Massage Therapist with a decade of experience treating tough pain cases. I was the Assistant Editor of ScienceBasedMedicine.org for several years. I’ve written hundreds of articles and several books, and I’m known for readable but heavily referenced analysis, with a touch of sass. I am a runner and ultimate player. • more about me • more about PainScience.com
This tutorial is for tough cases of chronic neck pain and particularly the phenomenon of neck “cricks” — that nasty stuck feeling. What makes a crick in the neck tick? What are the myths and controversies? What works, what doesn’t, and why? This is a detailed guide, regularly updated with fresh science for over a decade.
Neck pain [MayoClinic] afflicting almost everyone sooner or later. A tutorial like this is overkill if you’ve just woken up with a typical stiff neck. Put some heat on it, maybe do a little stretching, and you’ll probably be fine in a few days.
But maybe it’s a real whopper of a neck crick. Maybe you can hardly move! Or maybe it’s the fifth crick in the neck you’ve had this year. Or maybe you’ve had low-grade but constant, chronic neck stiffness [NHS] ever since that bicycle accident in 2015. Maybe you are starting to wonder if there’s any way to actually reach into your neck, pull out your cervical spine, and put in a replacement unit! You need plenty of good information, because education and fear-reduction may actually be a good neck pain treatment,12 while therapies, drugs, and surgeries have a poor track record.3
About footnotes. There are 247 footnotes in this document. Click to make them pop up without losing your place. There are two types: more interesting extra content,1Footnotes with more interesting and/or fun extra content are bold and blue, while dry footnotes (citations and such) are lightweight and gray. Type ESC to close footnotes, or re-click the number.
and boring reference stuff.2“Boring” footnotes usually contain scientific citations from my giant bibliography of pain science. Many of them actually have pretty interesting notes.
Chronic neck painmatters. The seriousness of chronic pain is often expressed in terms of the hair-raising economic costs of work absenteeism, but it may be much worse than that — a recent Swedish study shows that it probably even shortens people lives.4 The stakes are high. The quality of a life can be ruined, at least. And yet there is an enormous amount of misinformation about neck pain.5 Only low back pain rivals neck trouble for the sheer tonnage of half-baked theories.
For instance, there is a common idea out there that neck pain is related to abnormal cervical spine curvature, perhaps from poor posture. So many professionals believe this over-rated idea that you could probably get a hundred second opinions in a row without hearing otherwise. And yet research has virtually proved that the neck posture hypothesis is wrong or — at the very least — seriously oversimplified and underwhelming.
Abnormal vertebrae? Who cares …
Research has shown that abnormal curvature of the cervical spine is not closely associated with neck pain.
pro Strong enough for a pro But made for patients. The main text is user-friendly, but oodles of footnotes provide extra info and citations.
I do criticize many common practices and beliefs. If you disagree, let me know—I can take it, and I’ve made many changes over the years based on quality feedback.
But the news hasn’t gotten out, and the bogeyman of abnormal neck shape continues to be the basis of lots of expensive manual therapy that doesn’t work particularly well.6 Such ideas can be amazingly persistent. Neck pain myths are as stubborn as neck pain itself. I am sure that in ten years there will still be many professionals fixated on neck posture.
This tutorial carefully debunks many other misconceptions about neck pain — myths about subluxation and the spine being “out,” myths about muscle strain and muscle spasm, myths about arthritis and herniated discs and nerve pinches, and more — and it does it with great care to refer to and explain recent scientific research.7 There’s not much point in criticizing theories about neck pain if I’m just going to push my own unsupported theories, is there?
By the time you are done this tutorial, you are going to know more about your stiff neck than most therapists or even your doctor — perhaps especially your doctor! Most GPs are not really competent to treat neck pain, or any other difficult musculoskeletal problem.8 But before you get too cynical about “mainstream medicine” and run off to an alternative professional like a chiropractor or massage therapist, guess what? No one else is really qualified to treat neck pain either — no one at all, anywhere, because there are genuinely deep scientific mysteries about neck pain.
How can you trust this information about neck pain?
And I’ve worked hard for many years to provide the best information about neck pain available anywhere — not just more of it, but better.
However, there are limits to current scientific knowledge about neck discomfort. Not everyone can be helped. There is an alarming lack of honesty in health care about what actually is and is not known about how neck pain works and how to treat it.9 The goal of this tutorial is to help you navigate the maze of medical uncertainty and contradictions, and the many possible causes.
Dr. House: You sir, will, research all the causes in the universe of neck pain.
Dr. Chase: The list is like two miles long
Dr. House: Start with the letter A.
Dr. Greg House & Dr. Robert Chase, House, American TV series
This tutorial does not give you a magic bullet for neck pain, but it does provide readers with many ideas and “upgrades” to their approach to the problem. Most people who think they’ve “tried everything” have not actually tried everything. With some more informed and rational experimentation, many cases neck pain can improve from being almost crippling to manageable.
Who exactly is this tutorial for?
Head pain, face pain, and neck pain are a huge topic. I’ve narrowed the focus of this tutorial to the concept of cricks and chronic unexplained neck pain and closely related symptoms in the upper back and shoulders (upper backs get “cricks” too).
Some safety information is provided below for the rare cases of neck pain that may be caused by disease.
I have excluded detailed discussion of: face and jaw pain; neck pain with prominent nerve symptoms (tingling, numbness, zapping pain) in the arm; headaches10; and fresh whiplash, or other acute neck trauma.11
Most kinds of neck pain share some complications which I do cover in detail here. For instance, whiplash often leads to chronic neck pain.12 And this is particularly true if you had a lot of stress and aches and pains to begin with13 — a strange truth that is relevant to neck pain in general. And so, although this is not a whiplash tutorial, if you are still suffering from neck pain long after a neck injury should have healed, please read on.
And what about a pinched nerve?
Maybe you have a pinched nerve … and maybe you don’t. As with whiplash, this tutorial is useful to many people who have a true nerve root pain (radiculopathy). Even when nerve pain exists — and it does, just much less commonly than it is feared — it may prove to be a surprisingly minor problem that goes away on its own, perhaps when other neck issues are addressed. Severe cases of nerve pain are not addressed directly in this book, but I do put the topic in some perspective — and that can be helpful to many patients, particularly those who aren’t too sure about their diagnosis.
Smells a bit too good to be true! Nerve pain “goes away on its own”? Come on! But this is about as close as I get to claiming that there is a miracle cure in this tutorial — and it’s not that all that miraculous. It simply won’t work for many cases. However, it does for some, and how cool is that?
Reading on is a great way to settle this unsettling issue in your mind once and for all. There is a section devoted to the many common misconceptions about nerve pain; another section to help you identify nerve pain (or the lack of it); and a third section about safety issues related to massaging around nerves in the neck.
If you have significant or persistent tingling and numbness in the arms and hands, then the tutorial may be interesting and useful to you, but it will not focus on the options for your problem. Surgery is a more realistic option for patients in this category, but — not being a surgeon — I do not discuss surgery much. The value of this tutorial to such patients is that you might discover a way to avoid surgery.
The evidence that tissue pathology does not explain chronic pain is overwhelming (e.g., in back pain, neck pain, and knee osteoarthritis).
For those of you who have both neck and back pain, you may be more interested in reading Save Yourself from Low Back Pain! However, several key resources are shared between the two, and reading either one will get you some of the same key information.
Neck cricks and neck pain often go together, affecting about 50% of adults per year,14 ranging in severity from trivial to crippling. In my office, I see as many neck pain cases as low back pain cases. Almost every scientific paper on the subject starts by reeling off the ugly statistics about how many people are afflicted by neck pain, how many dollars it costs our economy every year, and how medically mysterious and tricky it is.
“Crick” is an informal term. You won’t find it in a medical dictionary. But perhaps you should, because it’s a major sub-type of neck pain. It feels like something in a joint is catching or sticking or locking when you try to move, a seemingly mechanical failure. Many neck crick sufferers insist that the problem is not exactly painful, but still extremely unpleasant — a sensation of stuckness that is “irritating” or “uncomfortable” or “stuck” or more like an “itch” or perhaps a “deep itch” than an actual pain.
Because a crick often does not hurt, per se, it is often underestimated and neglected, even by the patient. The use of that word “crick” can trivialize the problem. When it exceeds a certain degree of badness, no one calls it a “crick” anymore — the word feels too lightweight.
Never underestimate the power of a neck crick to make a person perfectly miserable. Not all pain is painful. It is possible to suffer deeply without hurting. A feeling of stuckness can be every bit as bad as severe pain. Cricks will nag and irritate to the point of nearly driving people out of their minds — a serious mental health hazard, no exaggeration. I have seen people showing every sign of severe chronic psychological distress, unable to function well mentally because their neck will not stop harassing them.
I’ve also experienced that state personally, once.
Upper backs get cricks, too! Neck pain and neck cricks routinely blend smoothly into the upper back. The muscular roots of the neck extend well into the upper back, and those thoracic joints appear to be nearly as prone to “cricking” as the cervical joints. I had a thoracic crick in the spring of 2009 that turned into my worst ever.
The low back, however, rarely seems to suffer from cricks. The classic crick sensation is typical only from between the shoulder blades and up. This is likely an important clue to their nature.
Although it’s like comparing apples to orange cars, I have often had the impression that irritating cases are more tragic than painful cases, causing more emotional distress — suffering — and mental preoccupation than pure pain. There is something profoundly unsettling about this kind of discomfort. I get email from readers around the world who recognize their predicament in these words, and want to reach out just to say, “Yeah, that’s me!”
So cricks make neck pain particularly “interesting,” in the sense of the Chinese curse.15 They are a simple sensation that no one can really explain. Not every case of neck pain includes a crick, but the terrible neck injuries and pain problems of today often become the persistent cricks of tomorrow. Pain and nagging stuckness are generally interwoven and the lines between them thoroughly blurred. So this tutorial is about both, but with a strong emphasis on the exasperating phenomenon of a crick.
What’s the worst case scenario for neck pain?
In the worst cases, with or without the best treatments available, neck pain and crick can be a life sentence of moderate to severe pain and/or irritation. As noted above, even a “painless” neck crick can still cause great suffering. A severe case can be severe indeed, and seemingly immune to all treatment efforts, without ever having a clear or certain diagnosis.
There are some limits on the severity.16 In terms of duration, though, there are no limits: neck pain can last five minutes, ten hours, several days, weeks or months … or forever. Most cricks are mild and resolve spontaneously, with or without treatment, within a few days or a couple of weeks at the longest. It’s important for fresh victims to know this — the reassurance is important and justified.17
“Contrary to prior belief, most individuals with neck pain do not experience complete resolution of their symptoms and disability.”
However, neck cricks and neck pain do have the potential to last and last. Most patients interested in this tutorial probably already think of their neck pain as chronic. Unfortunately, I have seen many patients with cricks that seem to be permanent. It is something of a myth that neck pain is a temporary problem. Many professionals are prone to reassuring neck pain patients a little too much. Chronic neck pain is usually less debilitating than back pain, and isn’t taken as seriously. And yet neck pain may be even longer-lasting than back pain, which is notorious for its chronicity.18 Only about 50% of patients recovered quickly according to Leaver et al.19 About 35% of cases of neck pain were “persistent” according to a Canadian survey of 1100 adults.20Côté et al: “Contrary to prior belief, most individuals with neck pain do not experience complete resolution of their symptoms and disability.” Damn.
I know of a case of a mild crick that remains unchanged after about eight years. I know of a serious case that lasted thirty-five years… but was then mostly cured by a few of massages. (His story coming up below.) So it’s hard to say how long a neck crick lasts, because the sky’s the limit. Fortunately, most cricks are indeed short-lived, and even the longest lasting ones still have the potential to be relieved.
So the worst cricks are rare, but when they occur they can cause enough pain to make normal life difficult, and can last pretty much forever. But it’s extremely unpredictable.
In the next section, I’ll discuss one of the main mechanisms that may drive neck pain chronicity: “sensitization.”
Neck pain as the tip of the sensitization iceberg
“Sensitization” is the tendency of the nervous system to get into a rut and start over-reacting to stimuli, an alarm system getting set off too easily.21 This is a well-described property of pain,22 the crown jewel of modern pain science,23 and evidence that either there is no God or only a cruel one. As a general rule, the longer any kind of pain lasts, the more likely sensitization is to become a factor, and even to take over and become the main problem.
Sensitization can complicate any chronic pain problem, and as my career lengthens I find myself writing about it more and more: all painful roads seem to lead to this topic. There is great variety in acute pain, but chronic pain is often defined by sensitization, regardless of how it all started.
And yet pain can also begin with sensitization, too. Certain kinds of pain — especially neck pain, back pain, and abdominal pain — can be the tip of a sensitization iceberg. And that’s why I’ve chosen to discuss this phenomenon in the context of prognosis and “worst case scenarios.” Because sometimes neck pain is just the beginning of something much more sinister. There’s a risk of scaring you here, so let’s keep a level head and remember that the vast majority of neck pain goes away and is not the tip of any iceberg… and there’s still plenty of hope even when it is.
But I’m not going to sugarcoat it: it is something you need to be aware of.
The gender connection
Interestingly, women suffer from neck pain more than men do. (There’s got to be a joke at the expense of husbands here somewhere.) According to Côté et al, women are 60% more likely than men to develop neck pain, and 20% more likely to develop chronic neck pain.
And, suspiciously, women also suffer from higher rates of other kinds of chronic pain — the overwhelming majority of fibromyalgia, for instance. Fibromyalgia is a diagnostic label for unexplained chronic widespread pain and fatigue (among other things), which is seems to involve a lot of sensitization. It often begins with stubborn regional pain in guess what regions? The neck and shoulders, the low back, the abdomen. Many fibromyalgia patients start their journey to hell with recurrent episodes pain in these areas, and then eventually the pain spreads and other classic fibromyalgia symptoms start to appear.24
Why women? No one knows. (But I do have a pet theory about this, which I’ll relegate to a footnote because it’s too speculative to clutter the main text with.25)
Which came first, the neck pain chicken or the sensitization egg?
How do we know that neck pain can be the beginning of sensitization? Could the neck pain just be ordinary neck pain at first, and then sensitization sets in over time as a complication… and then spreads, like an infection? Yes, it’s possible. But most people who end up with sensitization can recall subtle, early symptoms of sensitization dating all the way back to the beginning of their troubles. Neck pain was the main problem and other clues were overlooked or filed under “odd,” too vague and minor to interpret.
But surely sometimes the chicken does come first, and the other worst case scenario is that sensitization becomes the main reason that your neck keeps hurting — even if you never suffer from widespread symptoms. All chronic pain gets complicated by sensitization eventually, and some chronic cases are chronic not because there’s still something wrong with your neck tissues after all these years, but simply because your brain has set up a permanent ban on full neck movement (and pain is the main way the brain does that). This is why every chronic pain patient needs to know about sensitization.
To sum up, central sensitization is involved in two kinds of worst case scenarios for neck pain:
Neck pain may simply be the first, worst symptom of sensitization (along with, perhaps, back and/or abdominal pain).
Neck pain may become chronic due to sensitization, a permanent case of “false alarm,” but confined to the neck (no other complications).
And now for a random amusing story about neck pain. (And the key to the joke is knowing that the carpal tunnel is not in the neck — it’s in the wrist. Definitely the wrist.)
Yesterday I saw a guy who repeatedly mentioned that he’s a nurse. When he called he said he was having “carpal tunnel problems.” That’s fine, I can handle that. But when he came in, all he wanted to talk about was his neck pain. I can handle that, too. But I asked him why he’d said he was having carpal tunnel problems when he called. He said “because the carpal tunnel is in the neck.” When I tried to correct him, he argued with me, then walked out. Said he was going to “find a doctor who knows his damn anatomy.”
Three case studies of extreme neck crick horribleness
The one about the guy who had suffered for 35 years and couldn’t stop wrenching his neck around
It was by far the worst case I encountered in my decade as a massage therapist: a middle-aged man who had suffered ever since a serious motorcycle accident in his youth. The overall intensity of pain had been frequently debilitating, but was always greatly aggravated by a maddening sensation of stuckness just under his skull — a whopper of a classic crick, an itch he had been trying to scratch for three and a half decades by squirming and “wrenching” (his word) violently from side to side.
This wrenching behaviour was so severe and so habitual that it was a major feature of his identity, like a tic — and when he stopped doing it, friends and family were amazed.
His story is not only a good example of a worst case scenario, but it’s also instructive about the nature of neck cricks. It’s hard to imagine crick more mechanical than his, and indeed he had received hundreds of temporarily effective chiropractic treatments over the years. They always helped, but never for long. “Usually it would be ‘out’ again within minutes or hours,” he explained to me.26
And yet! This man’s tortured sensation of dislocation was more relieved, and for longer, by simple rubbing of the muscle tissue around the joint. This is a good demonstration that it is sometimes much easier to change the state of a joint by massaging muscles than by cracking joints.
“Usually my neck would be ‘out’ again before I got home from the chiropractor.”
He remained relatively crickless for a couple of years after I last worked with him — for the first time in more than thirty years. “It’s not cured,” he told me much later, “but it’s so much less than it used to be. It’s at least 80% gone. It’s mostly a bad memory.”
Of course, therapy doesn’t always go that well. Skilled therapists can be stumped by cricks, and I have seen several cases where no intervention made much difference, and some cases where chiropractic adjustment seemed to be the magic bullet. Although most cricks respond well to massage therapy, what makes some neck cricks come and go can be quite mysterious.
The one about the guy with the crick that was painless but immune to all therapy
This patient sought therapy for his problem continuously for at least a decade without a trace of relief: a completely invincible crick. He had no pain: he had a mildly irritating but completely unchanging sensation of stuckness in his lower cervical spine.
“It doesn’t really hurt, exactly,” he said. “But it drives me nuts.”
And nothing ever touched it. I was just another therapist who failed. I worked with him for more than ten hours over a few weeks — at least a thousand bucks worth of therapy — and had no effect. It’s like I wasn’t doing anything at all. Occasionally it seemed as though massaging the muscles in the area gave him some minor and temporary relief, but that distinctive feeling of stuckness remained, indomitable. The extraordinary persistence of it is qualified him as a “severe case,” like hiccoughs or an eyelid twitch that just never went away: a minor problem, unless it lasts forever.
The one about the woman whose neck pain was so severe that she had trouble functioning when it flared up
Another case that comes to mind is the opposite: severe, but also more episodic and treatable. With no history of trauma, this patient suffered bouts of stress-induced neck crick, pain, and headache about three or four times per year. She wasn’t just hurting: she was disabled, down for the count and whimpering. (That’s the kind of severity I described as “probably caused by disease” in the last section. But it wasn’t in her case.) The headache was bad, but secondary to the severe pain up one side of the back of her neck and a feeling of stuckness so strong that she couldn’t turn her head at all.
“It feels completely locked,” she said. I thought perhaps it might be too painful to turn, but no: “It hurts whether I turn or not,” she explained. “It doesn’t hurt any more when I try to turn. It just feels stuck.”
Despite the short term successes in treating her & despite how valuable she considered it, it didn’t feel like a success story to me, not when she always came back three months later with more pain.
And yet, despite its severity, this patient seemed more treatable than the other severe examples above. She responded well to massage therapy. She craved pressure on her muscles, and gushed about how much better she felt at the end of every session. Before massage, it took weeks to recover from an episode. With massage, she said she feels better immediately, and was back to normal within just a few days.
And it always came back. And that was really the issue: despite the short term successes in treating her, and despite how valuable she considered it, it didn’t feel like a success story to me, not when she always came back three months later with more pain. How long will this pattern go on for her? What a curse! It was a grim example of how bad neck cricks can be.
“What if there’s something really wrong with my neck?” Safety information!
“How do you know I’m not seriously hurt?”
“Could it be cancer? A tumor?”
Although it’s rare, once in a while neck pain may be a warning sign of cancer, infection, autoimmune disease, or some kind of structural problem like spinal cord injury or a threat to an important blood vessel. Fortunately, most of these ominous situations cause hard-to-miss signs and symptoms other than pain and are likely to be diagnosed correctly and promptly. If you are aware of the “red flags,” you can get checked out when the time is right — but avoid excessive worry before that.
The rule of thumb is that you should start a more thorough medical investigation only when three conditions are met, three general red flags for neck pain:
it’s been bothering you for more than about 6 weeks
it’s severe and/or not improving, or actually getting worse
there is at least one other “red flag” (see below)
And there is one (hopefully obvious) situation where there’s no need to wait several weeks before deciding the situation is serious: if you’ve had an accident with forces that may have been sufficient to fracture your spine or tear nerves. I didn’t really have to tell you that, did I? Well, I did for legal reasons! 😉
In all other cases, you can safely read this tutorial first.
Several more specific red flags for neck pain: a checklist
Check all that apply. Most people will not be able to check many of these! But the more you can check, the more worthwhile it is to ask your doctor if it’s possible that there’s something more serious going on than just neck pain. Most people who check off an item or two will turn out not to have an ominous health issue. But red flags are reasons to check… not reasons to worry.
Light tapping on the spine is painful.
Weight loss without dieting is a potential sign of cancer.
Mystery fevers and/or chills (especially in diabetic patients).
A fierce headache, and/or an inability to bend the head forward (nuchal rigidity), and/or fever, and/or altered mental state are all symptoms of meningitis (inflammation of the membranes covering the brain and spinal cord, caused by infection or drug side effects).
A severe headache that comes on suddenly is colourfully called a “thunderclap headache”! Most are harmless, but they should always be investigated.27
There are many possible symptoms of spinal cord trouble in the neck,28 mostly affecting the limbs in vague ways that can have other causes, but especially poor coordination, weakness, and shooting pains (including “sciatica” in the legs29). Bizarrely, cord compression may even cause fibromyalgia.30
Unexplained episodes of dizziness and/or nausea and vomiting may indicate a problem with stability of the upper cervical spine. Such symptoms should never be dismissed by alternative health professionals as “detoxification.” )
Steroid use, other drug abuse, and HIV are all risk factors for a serious cause of neck pain.
If you are feeling quite unwell in any other way, that could be an indication that neck pain isn’t the only thing going on.31
The main signs that neck pain might caused by autoimmune disease specifically include: a family history of autoimmune disease, gradual but progressive increase in symptoms before the age of 40, marked morning stiffness, pain in other joints as well as the low back, rashes, difficult digestion, irritated eyes, and discharge from the urethra.
There is a considerable amount of scientific mystery, debate and controversy about the nature of neck pain, and the solutions for it. It’s a medical muddle. As with the common cold and flu, we just don’t “get it” yet.
A detailed article in the January issue of 2009 of Pain Physician states clearly that “very little is known about the causes of neck pain.”32 No one should ever confidently claim to know the One True Cause of neck pain, because there are probably many true causes — many of them undiagnosable, or not reliably diagnosable — because we cannot (and may never be able to) look deeply into the living neck.
There is one type of explanation to beware of, the most popular-yet-vague idea in all of neck pain lore: the idea that your neck is “out.” People say “my neck is out,” and they really mean it: they aren’t thinking of it as a general term that might encompass any number of more specific issues. They truly suspect that a vertebral joint is partially dislocated, and this is almost certainly not the case. This pernicious idea is based mostly on the chiropractic concept of “subluxation,” which will be addressed in detail below. There can certainly be something wrong with your neck joints — that much is clear — but it’s probably a misleading and potentially anxiety-producing oversimplification to imagine that the joint is partially dislocated or out of place. It’s not really like that — it can’t be.
Because most neck pain is probably at least partially caused by muscle dysfunction, massage is one of the best therapies available. However, we’ll be reviewing all the treatment options.
This mess of possible causes is made more confusing by the fact that they all share at least one thing in common: an “equalizing factor” which tends to make them all seem surprisingly similar. No matter what it was that started the pain, painful muscular dysfunction almost certainly complicates it,33 and may even become the dominant problem. Meanwhile, painful muscle dysfunction itself is poorly understood, and probably underestimated as a factor by many (or most) health care professionals — even while some medical experts devote their careers to it,34 the medical majority still has a muscle blind spot,35 and even massage therapists may overlook it — surprisingly, massage therapy training does not go into much detail about the physiology of muscle pain or treatment methods.
So, nothing is certain, anything is possible, and nothing about neck pain can surprise me any more: not even the knowledge that — and this is so odd — neck pain is more common in short people.36 I’m a short person! And I have quite a bit of neck pain! Apparently that association is a fact, but it’s a fact that I can’t even begin to explain. In this tutorial I have written about what seems to be true and useful for most people, most of the time, and I’ve supported it with the best evidence available.
My chiropractor says this is because the top of my neck attaches to my head. Is that a common problem?
Rife with structures! What anatomical structures can cause pain in the neck? According to Benyamin et al: “cervical intervertebral disc, cervical facet joints, atlantoaxial and iconoclastically joints, ligaments, fascia, muscles, and nerve root dura which are capable of transmitting pain.” Or even the uncovertebral interface — a fine example of the complexity of this topic.37 All of these structures will be discussed to some degree, in this tutorial, in a user-friendly way.
The amount of “crick” in a case of neck pain varies, like seasoning in a recipe. However, most cases of neck pain involve at least some crick — and what is that sensation anyway? What makes a crick feel the way it does? What’s going on in there? We’ll explore this over the next few sections.
After my decade of clinical experience, my preferred explanation38 — not necessarily “correct,” but the most useful explanation for most people, most of the time — is the idea of “minor intervertebral derangement” (MID).3940 A MID is basically a minor mechanical malfunction in your spine, causing pain directly through mild trauma. A MID is probably not even as painful as a toe stub in most cases, or no more, but certainly painful enough to provoke a reaction. Here are some possible examples of MIDs:
Compression sprain.There are a pair of small, dime-sized joints on either side of every intervertebral joint, the facet joints.41 Their cartilaginous surfaces can be “bruised” when compressed, somewhat like a thumb jam.42 This might happen if you “zigged” when you should have “zagged” — a poorly coordinated movement of the neck.43 Minor compressions of this sort are probably extremely common, and mostly painless. Joint surfaces are not particularly sensitive to pressure.44
Synovial membrane pinch. Joint capsules — connective tissue wrappings — around the facet joints can probably be pinched between the joint surfaces, basically at random, and probably for the same reason that compression sprains occur (the “zigged when you should have zagged” theory). This has never been demonstrated scientifically to the best of my knowledge, but it is plausible. Unlike cartilaginous joint surfaces, synovial membranes (the lining of the capsule) are extremely sensitive.
Violent joint popping. The facet joints also “pop,” like knuckles. Although many people are used to the sensation of joint cracking in their necks, for others it is a surprising, uncomfortable, and even alarming sensation. A violent “crack” could constitute a minor MID.45
A nerve pinch. Although less of a problem than most people suppose (more about that in a while), irritation to nerves exiting the cervical spine is possible. Once again, a poorly coordinated movement can result in a momentary yank or pinch on nerve tissue. The sensation may be more alarming than actually damaging (but alarm is what makes things painful, not damage).
Note that none of these examples necessarily involve an on-going mechanical problem with the joint, just a painful, temporary disturbance. In most cases, the persistent feeling of a crick is probably not a product of an MID itself, but of its consequences: the irritation of the MID itself quickly dies down, and is overtaken by a variety of neurologic and muscular reactions, which are probably dominated by the pain of muscle knots.
More to come on the nature of this muscular reaction — it’s the most important idea in this tutorial. But first, let’s make sure that this business of a “mechanical malfunction” component of neck pain is thoroughly addressed. There’s a strong, intuitive desire to interpret neck pain as some kind of a mechanical failure of the neck joints, especially they idea that they are “out” of place in some sense. Is it reasonable?
Subluxation: can your neck be “out”?
by Gary Lyons
A defining feature of cricks is that something feels out of place or jammed, there may indeed be a joint dysfunction. But one fascinating, plausible possibility is that the crick sensation may be where the explanatory buck stops: that is, maybe the joint just feels wonky. Pain distorts body image — our mental image of our own anatomy. An odd little 2008 paper demonstrated that people with back pain really feel like their vertebrae are deviated to the painful side even when they aren’t.46
It’s a straightforward idea, so simple it probably isn’t satisfying, but this phenomenon could be potent and persuasive. We are used to more or less trusting our sensations. If it feels out, we assume it must be out. But it ain’t necessarily so: sensation can be incredibly deceptive. This could be the main reason for the stuck and janky quality of crick-ish neck pain. (It’s illusory quality doesn’t make it any less of a problem, of course: there’s still something wrong that’s powering the illusion.)
Or maybe that joint really is “out” in some sense. Let’s deal with that directly now: what about more literal, non-illusory subluxations?
Many experts, including quite a few chiropractors, actually deny that spinal subluxations exist in any meaningful sense.
There can certainly be something wrong with your spinal joints — there are a few possibilities — but “subluxation” and spinal joints being “out” are not defined clearly enough to be useful, and are probably quite misleading.
“Subluxation” is mainly a chiropractic idea of some kind of spinal joint dysfunction, with many shades of meaning — too many — depending on who is talking about it. However, it is inextricably entangled with the idea of a spinal joint being “out” of place, and it is this sense of the word that needs some debunking. Some chiropractors attribute great importance to subluxation. Most believe that subluxations cause neck and back pain, and — significantly — many also believe that they cause a wide variety of other health problems and so they “use spinal manipulation to treat visceral disease” (Homola). Subluxation theory has been both popular and controversial for many decades now, and it has never achieved medical respectability. Many experts, including quite a few chiropractors, actually deny that spinal subluxations exist in any meaningful sense.
It’s problematic that spinal manipulative therapy — the umbrella term for all kinds of spinal joint “adjustment” — is so often based on such a confusing and controversial concept. Subluxation has too much baggage to be a useful term. Let’s use more modern and specific terminology, and get away from the idea of spinal joints being “out.”
The controversies about subluxation theory are described thoroughly in a special supplement to this tutorial. You can also just read some highlights below, in this book’s section about treating neck pain with spinal adjustment.
Does Spinal Manipulation Work? Spinal manipulation, adjustment, and popping of the spinal joints and the subluxation theory of disease, back pain and neck pain ~ 13,000 words
Hey, wait a sec… aren’t MIDs and subluxations pretty similar ideas?
Reader J.B. asked this question in mid-2014, and I thought maybe I’d been caught in a glaring inconsistency.47 Lucky for me, there are some clear differences (and exploring them should be informative).
Although the chiropractic idea of “subluxation” is a hot mess, it does have two defining characteristics that have been consistent over the decades:
the idea of joints being “out”
the idea that they mainly matter because their out-ness has an on-going deleterious effect on nerve roots
The notion of an MID can’t be completely distinguished from the first, but it avoids the second completely.
Here’s another, trickier difference: chiropractor subluxation is mostly seen as a persistent pathological state of the joint. That is, the joint gets into and stays in a problematic state, allegedly something they can feel, or visible on an X-ray, or possibly apparent only with motion. In contrast, a MID is a transient mild trauma — an incident with painful consequences, not a persistent state of affairs. That’s the important distinction.
There is some conceptual overlap. For instance, if you do give yourself a little compression sprain of a zyapophyseal joint, ow, it’s plausible that the consequences would include not just irritation but some persistent joint dysfunction as well (e.g. the nervous system trying to move the spine without further compression the irritated surfaces).
Another possibility: the feeling of stuckness without being stuck
Consider how exquisitely sensitive we are to the presence of a grain of sand between the teeth: the tiniest obstruction, and we are fully and uncomfortably aware that something is in the way of our bite.
Or consider that we can detect even the slightest movement in our joints — if someone pushes on the tip of your shoe while your eyes are closed, no matter how gently, you will know.
And consider how irritating it can be for our freedom of movement to be limited! The feeling of needing to stretch your legs after being stuck in an airline seat can be almost overwhelming.
These hair-trigger sensations are powered by a rich sense of position and movement (proprioception, the “sixth sense”), and by a basic physiological need to constantly, physically stimulate all tissues in order to remain healthy. Stagnant tissues quite literally die — bed sores are the obvious example (and the stakes are life and death — it was an infected bed sore that killed Christopher Reeve in 2004). Thus we are programmed to detect and respond strongly to the slightest stagnancy. And this is, in a general way, is probably how a joint dysfunction can be so uncomfortable without actually having anything obviously “mechanically” wrong. Like the grain of sand between your teeth, even a tiny bit of joint “stuckness” is probably obvious to our nervous systems.
This could all occur without the slightest visible, palpable or X-rayable problem.
We can almost certainly feel “out” without being “out.” But what about the scenario — routine in neck cricks — where you literally can’t turn to one side or the other? That seems to be more than just a feeling of stuckness.
Stuck! What limits your range of motion?
So you can’t shoulder check while driving. You can barely move your head to get a shirt on. You can’t tilt your head to shave.
I can’t tell you how many hundreds of times I have heard such descriptions from my patients and readers. And friends. And family. And bank tellers, and convenience store cashiers. Seemingly anyone who has a neck and the power of speech has, at some point, had this unpleasant experience and told me about it. They are stuck — really stuck.
And I’ve been there, too. I’ve been stuck there.
Many cricks only involve a minor, vague feeling of stuckness, while others result in a more literal limited range of motion. Such stuckness may even occur with relatively little pain, and it is in such cases that the feeling of stuckness is the most vivid — it just won’t move. Surely there is something truly stuck or “outta whack” in the neck when you can barely move it?
Yes, there just might be. In some sense…
END OF FREE INTRODUCTION
Purchase full access to this tutorial for USD$1995. Continue reading immediately after purchase. A second tutorial about muscle pain is included free.
Secure payment takes about 2 minutes. No password or login, delivery is instant, and get a full refund whenever. MORE
Q Is it safe to use my credit card on your website?
A Yes. The store is safer than a bank machine. It’s managed by eSellerate, a small company in Nebraska I’ve worked with since 2006 — the same all-American tech support staff the whole time!
Q What does “secure” really mean?
A All information you send to the store is encrypted. Hackers don’t bother trying to crack single transactions — it would be like breaking into a bank vault for one credit card.
Q I really don’t need another username and password?
A You really don’t. You will never have to “login” on my site. I want it to be easy for my customers to buy my books. I’m funny that way. I automatically send you the product the instant your payment is received. If there’s any problem with auto-delivery — about 1 in 500 orders — I take care of you personally, fast.
What do you get, exactly? A tutorial, the size of a small book (64,000 words). Get free updates forever, read on any device, online or off, lend it out. MORE
Q What am I buying? Is there an actual paper book?
A There is no paper book. I sell digital reading material only: web-based tutorials — for instant delivery, and many benefits “traditional” e-books can’t offer, especially hassle-free lending and free updates for life. Health care information changes fast! You get free lifetime access to the always-current “live” web version and offline reading is no problem.
Read on any device. Lend it out. New editions free forever.
Q I just don’t like reading on the computer! Is there any way around that?
A Yes: the design and technology of the book is ideal for reading on tablets and smart phones, and offline reading is no problem. You can also print the book on a home printer.
Q Can I lend the tutorial out?
A Yes! Feel free to lend your tutorial: I do not impose silly lending limits like with most other ebooks. No complicated policies or rules, just the honour system! You buy it, you can share it.
Buy more & save 50%! Get a “boxed” set of all eight tutorials for great savings.MORE
Save a bundle on a bundle! The boxed set is a 50% discounted bundle of all 8 book-length tutorials for sale on this website. It’s ideal for professionals, keen patients, and anyone who wants more for less. Purchased individually, all the tutorials would cost $160, but the set price is only $79.50. More information and purchase options.
Free second tutorial! When you buy this tutorial, you will also get Save Yourself from Trigger Points and Myofascial Pain Syndrome! — a $1995 value. Muscular dysfunction is a factor in nearly all cases of neck pain, and no discussion of neck pain could ever be complete without also thoroughly exploring the phenomenon of muscle knots (trigger points). Although basic information about trigger points is provided in the neck pain tutorial, it’s too large a subject to cover properly here — so I provide PainScience.com’s trigger point tutorial as an essential free companion to the neck pain tutorial.
••••• dots before headings indicate updated sections ?There’s a detailed description of all updates at the bottom of the tutorial, and it’s nice to be able to see what’s new at a glance in the table of contents. Any section updated in the last 400 days is marked (hotter colours = fresher updates).
read on any device, no passwords
refund at any time, in a week or a year
call 778-968-0930 for purchase help
This document and all of PainScience.com was, for many years, created in my so-called “spare time” and with a lot of assistance from family and friends. Undying thanks to my wife, Kimberly, for countless indulgences large and small, and for being my “editor girlfriend”; to my parents for (possibly blind) faith in me, and much copyediting; and to Mike Gobbi, buddy and digital mentor, for many of the nifty features of this document (hidden and obvious). And thanks to all of the above, and many others, for many (many) answers to “what do you think of this?” emails.
Thanks finally to every reader, client, customer, and big tipper for your curiosity, your faith, and your feedback and suggestions and stories. Without you, all of this would be pointless.
Unexplained episodes of nausea and vomiting, combined with neck pain? See PS What Happened To My Barber? — Either atlantoaxial instability or vertebrobasilar insufficiency causes severe dizziness and vomiting after massage therapy, with lessons for health care consumers.
The first version of this document was created in 2002. It was upgraded and expanded several times before I started keeping track of updates put it up for sale in September of 2007. It was revised and expanded to book-length in the summer 2009, and continues to be updated as new scientific information becomes available, and in response to reader requests and suggestions.
Regular updates are a key feature of PainScience.com tutorials. As new science and information becomes available, I upgrade them, and the most recent version is always automatically available to customers. Unlike regular books, and even e-books (which can be obsolete by the time they are published, and can go years between editions) this document is updated at least once every three months and often much more. I also log updates, making it easy for readers to see what’s changed. This tutorial has gotten 77 major and minor updates since I started logging carefully in late 2009 (plus countless minor tweaks and touch-ups).
Most links to sections shown here work for customers only. For access to all sections, buy the tutorial for $19.95. You’ll get the full version right away.
— Revision: Modernization and expansion; added more information about surgical options in particular.
— New section: Tips and a checklist for trying to estimate how much your neck pain might be about sensitization.
— Correction: An evidence-based correction regarding computer display position.
— Big upgrade: Continued to beef up the science of psychological risk factors, and also added much more about other kinds of risk factors. The section almost doubled in size.
— Science update: Two key new citations to support the idea that the state of muscle tissue is a big factor in neck pain.
— Science update: A paragraph about genetic vulnerability to persistent neuropathic pain.
— New section: Substantial new section about sensitization, an important perspective on chronic neck pain.
— Science update: Solid little science update based on Nakashima et al, showing huge numbers of intervertebral disc bulges in healthy people.
— Upgraded: Several good red flag clarifications and a couple interesting new references about spinal cord compression.
— Science update: Significant revision and some important new citations more firmly establishing the link between psychological and lifestyle factors and poor recovery from neck pain. Previously this section relied too much on similar evidence about other problems: it is now more neck-centric.
— Science update: Added some useful new indirect evidence about SMT for migraine (Chaibi et al).
— Edited: Added some important footnotes and clarifications.
— Edited: Thorough revision and modernization. Although I revised this section a mere five years ago, it needed it again!
— New section: More than a thousand new words on the topic of neck cracking.
— Science update: Revised the introduction to treatments for clarity and completeness, added new references, and a new short paragraph about risks and harms.
— Major update: Broadened scope of section to include all pain killers. Added a summary of opioids, and a guide to experimenting with the over-the-counter ones; added more science; merged and edited previously separate sections on rebound pain and muscle relaxants.
— Correction: Removed overconfident statements about the clinical significance of the effects of psychoactive drugs, plus related minor updates.
— Minor update: Some editing and new caveats.
— Update: Added new intro to section about distorted body image.
— Science update: Added citation about the efficacy of ibuprofen for headache.
— Science update: Added some particularly good science to shore up the personal anecdote added in January.
— Improved: Added a new key point about how to recognize the pain of a nerve root pinch.
— Science update: New footnote supporting the use of education (like this tutorial!) to treat chronic pain.
— Minor update: Added a good personal ancedote…because my spine is degenerating! Also, a footnote about surprisingly painless joint damage.
— Science update: Added some hard evidence on the minor (non-lethal) risks of SMT from Carlesso 2010.
— Science update: Added an interesting reference to Carlesso 2013 with some discussion of the implications.
— Science update: Added a humility citation, conceding the absence of scientific evidence that massage helps neck pain. Also, modernization summary of trigger point therapy.
— Science update: Added a little more information about the nature of uncovertebral joints.
— Upgraded: More and clearer red flag details, especially about spinal cord trouble (myelopathy).
— Major update: Completely rewritten and greatly expanded, with much more science, emphasizing strength as a worthwhile treatment option.
— Revised: Editing and some new science about changing head posture.
— Minor update: More data on neck pain recovery rates
— Minor addition: Added a patient anecdote about a strange muscle spasm experience…which I know all too well.
— Minor update: Added an expert quote.
— Science update: Added brief example of nerve pinch by vertebral artery twistiness.
— Science update: Added three good references and a diagram about how much “wiggle” room nerve roots have.
— Expanded: Added about 350 words about neck circle safety.
— Science update: Added a new good-news study about massage for neck pain.
— Minor update: Upgraded references on neck pain recovery rates.
— Science update: Added some important acknowledgements that the science of trigger points is a bit half-baked, and linked out to much more information for the curious.
— More content: Explanation of the difference between a subluxation and an MID.
— Science update: Added citation to a key 2012 study of the effectiveness of adjustment for neck pain.
— Minor update: Added a (fascinating) footnote about the myth of anaesthetic paralysis.
— Minor yoga update: Added a reference and paragraph about the risks of yoga, which are minor but real, especially for neck pain.
— Minor science update: Added a tiny, flawed study about yoga for neck pain (for what little it’s worth).
— New evidence: Rare good news: the first good quality scientific test showing that reducing fear is actually good medicine. The section got a decent editing as well.
— New section: No notes. Just a new section.
— Science update: Added evidence that the stakes are high with chronic pain: it may even shorten lives.
— Science update: Added a key reference about the effectiveness of massage for back pain, with the (safe) assumption that it probably applies to neck pain as well.
— Science update: A new study shows that massage therapists cannot reliably find the side of pain by feel — good evidence that no gross spasm (or other structural factor) is usually involved.
— Minor update: Added some creative problem-solving for hot climates.
— Minor update: Added a minor but odd note about “sensory annoyances” like hats and collars.
— Minor update: Added some unusual research about the risks heavy metal “head-banging” — a fun example, for perspective.
— More content: Added scientific cases studies, examples, pictures and video of true dislocation and abnormal anatomy to help drive home the point that even significant spinal joint dysfunction can be surprisingly harmless … never mind subtle joint problems.
— trivial update: Trivial but fun. Added an amusing quote about neck pain diagnosis from the TV series, House.
— Minor science update: Cited a study about yoga and stretching for back pain.
— New section: This section is a summary of an important concept that’s been available in a free article since late 2008, but also needed to be emphasized here. Now it is.
— Minor update: Added a reference about the poor overall quality of online information about common injuries. See Starman et al.
— Added a fun thing: I can’t believe I didn’t know about inflatable neck extenders until now!
— New section: More information about an important characteristic of muscle-dominated neck pain.
— Major update: Totally renovated section: re-written, reformatted, expanded, upgraded. A few new checklist items were added, most were expanded, and all were clarified. A separate and handier “quick” checklist was added to the existing “slow” checklist.
— Major update: Major improvements to the table of contents, and the display of information about updates like this one. Sections now have numbers for easier reference and bookmarking. The structure of the document has really been cleaned up in general, making it significantly easier for me to update the tutorial — which will translate into more good content for readers. Care for more detail? Really? Here’s the full announcement.
— Upgraded: New artwork from PainScience.com artist Gary Lyons, plus some important new references.
— Updated: Updated with an important story about a disastrous example of neck stretching that backfired. Not just for customers: this particular section is a short version of a new free article.
— Minor update: Some good new science cited in the introduction, about the overall effectiveness of manual therapies. See D'Sylva et al.
— Major Update: Rewriting and expansion of the Special Supplement on spinal manipulative therapy.
— New section: First new section since the huge update in the fall, a short-but-useful section.
— Huge upgrade: Over the past several months, the neck pain tutorial has more than quadrupled the amount of information it offers, and it is now book-length at more than 40,000 words. Almost every single section was overhauled, and many new sections were added. Dozens of references to more recent scientific research were integrated and their significance explained, including several good new studies less than six months old.
Chronic pain may be treatable with tutorials like this one. Researchers tested a series of web-based pain management tutorials on people who had been suffering for more than six months. No matter how much (or little) help they had from doctors and therapists, they all experienced significant reductions in disability, anxiety, and average pain levels, for at least three months. So keep reading!
This is one of a few studies showing a benefit to education for neck pain specifically. Researchers showed a reassuring educational video to more than 200 patients with “whiplash associated disorders” (i.e. whiplash injuries that become chronic neck cricks), and found that they had less severe symptoms than patients who received no educational intervention. The effectiveness of education probably depends a lot on the type of neck pain and the type of education, making it very hard to study. A recent review of the scientific literature found that most such studies are negative (see Haines or Ainpradub), but I believe that there are still reasons to be optimistic about education for pain problems. Above all, it depends on the type and quality of the education! The right education may be effective, and the wrong could even be harmful. The fact that some education has been shown to be beneficial is promising.
The best recent evidence of this is a 2008 study in Journal of the American Medical Association that showed that “spine-related expenditures have increased substantially from 1997 to 2005, without evidence of corresponding improvement in self-assessed health status” (see Martin). In other words, a lot of expensive medical care is not helping. This interesting paper was summarized well by Parker-Pope in the New York Times. BACK TO TEXT
Can pain shorten your life? A large Swedish study of four million Swedes looked for a correlation between increased mortality and work absenteeism due to painful musculoskeletal conditions. They found the first ever evidence that people who have musculoskeletal pain may have “an increased risk of premature death.” The researchers adjusted their data for “several potential confounders.” It’s a plausible and disturbing conclusion. The costs of pain are often expressed in terms of hair-raising stats on the economics of work absenteeism — but they may be much greater still.
In 2010, the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery reported that “the quality and content of health information on the internet is highly variable for common sports medicine topics,” such as knee pain and low back pain — a bit of an understatement, really. Expert reviewers examined about 75 top-ranked commercial websites and another 30 academic sites. They gave each a quality score on a scale of 100. The average score? Barely over 50! For more detail, see Starman et al. BACK TO TEXT
The standard techniques of physiotherapists, massage therapists, and chiropractors all produce generally poor results with neck pain: they work a little bit, sometimes, with some people, temporarily. Truly good success stories are rare. This lacklustre performance was confirmed in 2010 by a new study of studies (a meta-analysis) in Manual Therapy (see D'Sylva). Although the science is complex and limited and about 75% of studies had to be eliminated from consideration due to likely bias, one thing was clear: manual therapy isn’t exactly curing a lot of neck pain. It has “low to moderate quality evidence” that it’s helpful, compared to advice and exercise alone. BACK TO TEXT
We have recently emerged from something of a dark period in the scientific study of neck pain. Always something a poor cousin to low back pain research, there was a surprising lack of analysis of neck pain research available — perhaps because of a lack of research to analyze. According to the journal Spine in early 1998, “No comprehensive systematic literature reviews have been published on interventions for neck pain and its associated disorders in the past decade” (see Hurwitz). However, since then there have been many important new studies, and much more analysis. Although this tutorial is many years old, it was significantly renovated throughout 2009 to include this new science, and will continue to be updated indefinitely. BACK TO TEXT
Borenstein DG. Chronic neck pain: how to approach treatment. Current Pain & Headache Reports. 2007 Dec;11(6):436–439. As recently as 2009, these experts wrote that, “despite its frequency as a clinical problem, there are few evidence-based studies that document efficacy of therapies for neck pain.” I agree: the really good studies can practically be counted on your fingers and toes, and the field is basically still in its infancy. And yet, of course, there are tens of thousands of doctors and therapists out there who will happily tell you that they “know” how to treat your chronic neck pain. Take it with a grain of salt. There are good ideas out there, but no honest professional should feel confident. BACK TO TEXT
Many headaches are probably caused by neck issues: “cervicogenic” headaches are “from the neck,” a whole class of headaches (and somewhat controversial actually, and therefore interesting). A future edition of the tutorial will probably cover them, but for now it’s big enough. If headache is your main problem, and it seems to be related to neck pain, the tutorial is worthwhile. For patients who are experiencing headaches and migraine without clear neck pain, I recommend other resources, such as Jim Cottrill’s excellent migraine blog. I do have a modest tension headache tutorial. BACK TO TEXT
While face and jaw pain often do occur with neck pain, and there is probably a relationship between them, they involve many special issues. This tutorial does not address them in any detail. BACK TO TEXT
From the abstract: “… it is reasonable to infer that a significant proportion of individuals with chronic neck pain in the general population were originally injured in a motor vehicle accident.” See also Atherton.
480 people with neck pain after car accidents completed questionnaires three times during the year after their accident. 128 (27%) reported neck pain every time. “The greatest predictors of persistent neck pain…relate to psychological distress and aspects of pre-collision health rather than to various attributes of the collision itself.” In other words, people who went into the accident with the most stress and body pain were the most likely to suffer chronic neck pain. For a short article discussing this research, see A Recipe for Chronic Neck Pain After Whiplash.
The findings are generally confirmed by more research since. See Carstensen.
Interestingly, the “interesting” curse is probably not Chinese, but English or American. According to Wikipedia, “The Chinese language origin of the phrase, if it exists, has not been found, making its authenticity doubtful.” Also interesting, regardlessof its provenance, is that it is the first of three curses, the other two being: (1) may you come to the attention of those in authority, and (2) may you find what you are looking for. BACK TO TEXT
Neck pain that escalates steadily to crippling levels over weeks or months is more likely to be caused by disease. If this is your problem, please review the safety section! Also, although the worst cases of neck pain can certainly cause “severe” pain, I only mean severe for neck pain and not “off the scale” pain that blots out the sun and makes it impossible to function or work. The worst non-ominous neck pain is roughly the intensity of the worst tension headaches…but definitely not like a full-blown migraine, child birth, or rheumatoid arthritis. BACK TO TEXT
Checking up on 200 patients who were diagnosed with neck or back pain 12 years prior, this study showed that neck pain was quite a bit more persistent than back pain: “Only 4% of the neck/shoulder group reported no present discomfort compared with 25% of the low back group.”
But it’s hard to be sure, of course, because there are so many ways of measuring. The most optimistic estimates for back pain I’ve seen, from a 1994 paper (Coste et al), reported 90% recovered within two weeks — definitely better than most of the neck pain data. Another rather hopeful example is Costa et al, which showed that Chronic Low Back Pain Is Not So Chronic. At the other end of the scale, the least promising recovery data about back pain is about the same as what Côté et al found for neck pain.
Yes, I just cited Coste, Costa, and Côté — completely coincidental. 😃
I cited Leaver above as good news, because half of patients with new cases recover within three months. But it’s obviously good-and-bad-news science, because of the other half: “almost half of those who seek treatment do not recover completely within three months.” Which is actually quite a high number. BACK TO TEXT
A more detailed definition: Pain itself often modifies the way the nervous system works, so that a patient actually becomes more sensitive and gets more pain with less provocation. This is often called “central” sensitization because it’s driven by the central nervous system, by changes in the spinal cord and brain, but there’s peripheral sensitization too. Sensitized patients are not only more sensitive to things that should hurt, but sometimes also to ordinary touch and pressure as well (allodynia). Their pain also often “echoes,” fading more slowly than in other people. Sensitization is closely associated with all the more serious chronic pain conditions. BACK TO TEXT
“Modern pain science” refers to the abandoment of the idea that pain is a relatively simple response to tissue damage. Instead, it’s an unpredictable top-down alarm system that responds to tissue conditions and many other variables, and has as much power to “mute” pain as it does to produce it. See Pain is Weird. BACK TO TEXT
Debilitating fatigue, fragmented and shallow sleep, mental fog, depression, difficulty recovering from exercise. The quality of the pain may change from more ordinary “aches and pains” to more exotic and varied, more disconnected from reality, pain that just make no sense. BACK TO TEXT
Here’s my chain of reasoning: (1) one of the fascinating possible causes of fibromyalgia symptoms is intermittent spinal cord pinching (positional cervical cord compression, or “PC3,” a form of myelopathy, which is described in detail in the fibromyalgia article); (2) it’s plausible this is associated with a certain amount of stubborn neck pain (which is indeed one of the most common trouble areas in fibromyalgia patients); (3) finally, perhaps this scenario is more common in women for some reason, such as anatomical differences in the spine. A major 2016 studycontradicts my third point there — women appear to have “milder evidence of degenerative cervical myelopathy” than men — but there are so many complex variables here that the hypothesis doesn’t need to be thrown out. And there are other reasons why women might be more vulnerable to positional cervical cord compression. BACK TO TEXT
That’s the notorious “parking lot” effect in manual therapy: you get relief, but so briefly that you’re already back in trouble again by the time you get out to the parking lot! BACK TO TEXT
Thunderclap headaches have many possible causes, several dozen of them (see Devenney et al). Most are benign, but many are frightening and even deadly, and there’s no way to tell the difference without expert help. If you are having sudden, severe headaches, please see your doctor. BACK TO TEXT
Symptoms caused by spinal cord trouble are called “myelopathy.” And there are a lot of possible symptoms: it depends on which part of the spinal cord is affected. And many of them can have other causes. And it may worsen slowly and erratically over long periods. You can’t really confirm a myelopathy diagnosis without professional help, so please consult a doctor if you’re suspicious. Some of the most common symptoms are poor hand coordination; weakness, “heavy” feelings, and atrophy; diffuse numbness; shooting pains in the limbs (especially when bending the head forward); an awkward gait. BACK TO TEXT
A report on two cases of cervical spinal cord impingement causing leg pain — both examples of pain at a location unusually remote from a subtle lesion (referred pain) — both successfully treated surgically. Notably, both cases involved previous lumbar spine problems.
Interestingly, such distant referred pain is tangentially relevant to the hypothetical phenomenon of cervical spinal cord irritation causing fibromyalgia (see Using Dynamic MRI to Diagnose Neck Pain).
A remarkable article for a medical audience, technical and scholarly but cogent, exploring fascinating potential connections between PC3 and/or Chiari malformation and fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain.
Drs. Janet Travell and David Simons devoted their career to the study of soft tissue pain and myofascial pain syndrome, and published the incredibly authoritative “red texts” on the subject (Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction). Simons and Mense have continued that work with the recent text, Muscle Pain. Clair Davies’ excellent popularization of the red texts, The Trigger Point Therapy Workbook, has sold extremely well in recent years, is endorsed by a dozen medical experts, and has generally resulted in patients knowing more about muscle pain than doctors. Dr. John Sarno of New York is one of the world’s most successful back and neck pain clinicians, and in his writings independently develops essentially the same theoretical conclusions as Travell and Simons. Vancouver’s own Dr. Chan Gunn has spent twenty years working on an extremely well-reasoned alternative hypothesis for soft tissue pain, and has developed one of the world’s more novel and effective therapies for trigger points, intramuscular stimulation. There are many others. These are all experts who present a compelling case of the importance of muscle pain. BACK TO TEXT
Self-confessed medical ignorance about neck pain is common. One textbook declares, “The [neck pain] epidemic is difficult to explain from a biomechanical perspective. The patient seldom has definite pathophysiological changes or specific clinical signs.” (Clinical Guide to Sports Injuries, p27). It’s always refreshing to hear medical experts honestly saying “I don’t know,” but it is disturbing how ignorant they seem to be of the explanation that follows naturally from the work of the experts mentioned above (Travell, Simons, Mense, Sarno, Gunn), serious medical researchers and gifted clinicians who have literally devoted their entire careers to understanding how muscle probably explains the epidemic of neck and back pain. Their publications seem to be ignored by the medical mainstream. BACK TO TEXT
This study examined 430 children over several years and found that “short stature at 11 years of age predicted the incidence of neck pain,” and therefore concluded that “Short stature may be a risk determinant of neck pain.”
This is quite a technical paper about some special joints unique to the cervical spine: unconvertebral joints (AKA Luschka’s joints or neurocentral joints). It suggests “that the structure is synovial in nature” and that “the uncovertebral joints are potential pain generators in the cervical spine.”
Basically, an uncovertebral joint consists of small overlapping lips of bone extending from the top and bottom edges of vertebral bodies. It’s a strange, maybe-a-synovial-joint-and-maybe-not structure so obscure that it barely has a Wikipedia page. And yet arthritic overgrowth at this joint may be one of the most common causes of pinched cervical nerve roots (or even the spinal cord)
The idea of my “preferred explanation” deserves some clarification. I most certainly do not “know” exactly what actually makes a crick feel like a crick. However, I have settled on a working theory over the years, an explanation that (1) is reasonably consistent with available scientific evidence and my clinical observations, while still leaving plenty of theoretical leeway for interpretation and anomalies; and (2) is also communicative. This second quality is actually terribly important in a working theory: as long as it is actually sensible, so much the better if it is also a compelling piece of imagery that helps readers “get it”! I also vastly prefer the imagery of the MID to the imagery of the spine being “out,” which tends to aggravate patients’ fears that their spine is fragile. BACK TO TEXT
“Facet” is the easier but technically incorrect term for them. The proper term is one of the gnarliest in all of anatomy: zygapophysial joint. BACK TO TEXT
This is sometimes called a compression sprain, though it is not technically a “sprain” and cartilage can’t bruise because it contains no blood vessels. A more common example of this injury is a “thumb jam,” especially in rugby, where the thumb joint is bent back and/or harshly slammed together, traumatizing the joint surfaces. In the case of a typical minor MID, the forces are likely to be much smaller. BACK TO TEXT
When you turn your head, a large number of muscles have to coordinate, literally dozens of them. Some of them have to contract. Some of them have to relax, so that they don’t resist movement. And they have to do this fast and in more less perfect harmony. It doesn’t always work out, and one error is all it takes. BACK TO TEXT
Indeed, they are so insensitive that only traumatic compression might actually cause a problem. Even extremely strong movements in a healthy neck, smushing the facet joints together as firmly as possible, causes no discomfort — or, if it does, it’s coming from other tissues, like the synovical membranes (see next item). BACK TO TEXT
Your emotional reaction is relevant: if it scares you, the incident can provoke a cascade of significant neurologic consequences. Context is everything. Even as a “cracky” person, used to the sensation, occasionally I have had joint pops so dramatic that I felt alarmed. BACK TO TEXT
In this small, unusual study, six patients with low back pain were asked to draw their perceptions of their back and spine. For comparison, a group of ten patients with no recent back pain were asked to do the same exercises. They were encouraged to “draw what it feels like” rather than how it actually looked.
“All the patients, and none of the controls, showed disrupted body image of the back” on the same side and level as the pain. For instance, they did not have a clear sense of the outline of their trunk.
Most intriguingly, patients with back pain on just one side illustrated vertebrae deviated towards the painful side (without any obvious actual deviation).
Somehow, over a period of many years, the similarity of these concepts, and my potential hypocrisy, never once crossed my mind! How can I be skeptical about subluxations, but use “minor intervertebral derangements” as a key concept? Fishy! BACK TO TEXT
There are 200 more footnotes in the full version of this book. I like footnotes, and I try to have fun with them.