Too big to fail: the power of big webpages

Paul Ingraham

It’s not common, but occasionally I get a complaints like this:

Way, way more information than I needed. Just get to the point need tell me what I need to do to fix my back! Sheesh!

Ironically, this overwhelmed readers probably wouldn’t trust me to tell them what they need to do if they weren’t bewildered by my verbosity. And yet I actually agree: my books and feature articles are indeed way too long. Concision is a virtue! If writing quality was the only consideration, I would never drone on the way that I do. Shorter would be better by purely “literary” standards.

But there are other standards. My unrestrained delving is a powerful selling feature: it distinguishes my content in the marketplace, establishing authority and trust in a way that shorter documents cannot hope to match. No matter how crafty and brilliant, even a 5,000-word article — quite long for a blog post — just cannot compete with the gravitas implied by 50,000 words. Especially if the deep dive is also well-written.

It’s impossible to measure, but I believe that my business depends on this equation. So I let myself be long-winded (while also mitigating the tedium as much as I can).

End of post marker

Last post: Anti-inflammatories and tendons

Next post: Molecular biology is “fast and crowded”