So there’s this article I wrote for PainScience.com in 2007. It’s going to remain anonymous for the purposes of this post. Because it’s embarrassing.
The article has been bringing in a lot of readers per month for ages now, years, about 3000 of ‘em, with an average reading time of several minutes (which is very good; it means that people are actually reading it). So it’s a busy article for PainScience.com … but not so busy that it was really on my radar as a top article. Not a high priority. I have a few dozen in this league, and dozens more that get much more traffic.
So I basically haven’t thought about this particular article since I wrote it.
Today I finally read it
I found at least three cringe-inducingly obsolete key ideas in it. Nothing too horrible, but … just shabby old stuff I abandoned about five years ago, closer to when I wrote the damn thing than to the present. Words I’m really not proud to have my name on today.
Being read by a few thousand people a month.
Roughly a hundred thousand readers.
Oh, my. It’s not a bad article. But it does contain multiple strong statements that I think are misleading to readers and embarrassing to me, statements so cocky that obviously it hadn’t yet occurred to me that there was any possibility of doubt. In 2007, I just knew!
It will probably take me a few hours to fix, which I just can’t do on the spot. It’s going to have to go in the to-do list, where it will rub shoulders with dozens of other similar chores, competing for my attention for weeks or months before I finally get to it.
Fixing crap like this is the difference between “blogging” and trying to maintain a high-quality million-word educational website.
This is basically my job for the rest of time. It’s like painting a big bridge: it takes so long to paint that, by the time it’s finished, it’s already time to start repainting again at the other end!