PainScience.com Sensible advice for aches, pains & injuries
 
 

microblog

The back is still important in back pain

Paul Ingraham ARCHIVEDMicroblog posts are archived and rarely updated. In contrast, most long-form articles on PainScience.com are updated regularly over the years.

These things are terrible at finding the causes of back pain. But that doesn’t mean it’s not there.

Radical idea! For several years now, it’s been progressive — maybe almost fashionable — for back pain educators (like me) to trash talk magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a tool for finding the causes of back pain. (Because it has a really poor track record. Which is the most thoroughly referenced point made anywhere on PainScience.com. And that’s really saying something!)

However, just because we can’t seem to reliably find smoking gun causes of back pain with modern imaging technology does not mean it isn’t there. Physical therapist and researcher Tony Ingram makes this important point in a short, clear, evidence-based opinion piece, The back is still important in back pain. And I’ve added a reference to it to my back pain book, of course.

See also this academic paper from 2011: What happened to the ‘bio’ in the bio-psycho-social model of low back pain?

This is the MICROBLOG: small posts about interesting stuff that comes up while I’m updating & upgrading dozens of featured articles on PainScience.com. Follow along on Twitter, Facebook, or RSS. Sorry, no email subscription option at this time, but it’s in the works.