PainScience.com • Good advice for aches, pains & injuries

microblog

Antibiotics for back pain: still no

Paul Ingraham ARCHIVEDMicroblog posts are archived and rarely updated. In contrast, most long-form articles on PainScience.com are updated regularly over the years (see updates page).

Maybe some back pain is caused by low-grade bacterial infection and therefore treatable with antibiotics. I have been following the story of this hypothesis since 2013. A new test (Bråten et al) has more or less slammed the door shut on it: antibiotics don’t make enough of a difference to take seriously. This attracted some amusing snark from people puzzled by the need for such a study:

But the study was charmingly defended by Dr. Paul Sax (also just a solid review of the topic):

Allow me to defend the people who did the study, and go even further — this is exactly the sort of practical, hypothesis-testing trial I wish we’d see more often. … Even negative studies are important. It could have been an H. pylori and peptic ulcer disease.

Imagine if it had been! Checking is good. I’d even like to remove “even” from that statement: studies with negative results are not second class citizens in any way. We need them. In some contexts, they are disastrously missing (see file drawer effect and the AllTrials.net Campaign)

I’ve updated my back pain book with the new reference.

 End of post. 
This is the MICROBLOG: small posts about interesting stuff that comes up while I’m updating & upgrading dozens of featured articles on PainScience.com. Follow along on Twitter, Facebook, or RSS. Sorry, no email subscription option at this time, but it’s in the works.