Detailed guides to painful problems, treatments & more

Patellofemoral pain syndrome: a review of current issues

PainSci » bibliography » Thomeé et al 1999
updated

One article on PainSci cites Thomeé 1999: The Complete Guide to Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

PainSci notes on Thomeé 1999:

A review of “current” patellofemoral pain issues in 1999. Given the sad pace of progress in this field, it’s fair to say that, even a great many years later, we still don’t have a “clear consensus in the literature concerning the terminology, aetiology and treatment for pain in the anterior part of the knee.”

Two major general explanations for PFPS, “malalignment” and “muscle balance,” were unsupported by evidence then … and are still that way now.

Thomeé, Augustsson, and Karlsson also called for treatments to be studied with “prospective, randomised, controlled, long term studies using validated outcome measures.” Do those exist today? Nope.

This is not to say that no progress has been made whatsoever, but it is not great, and this 1999 paper strongly remains depressingly “current” more than 20 years after its publication.

original abstract Abstracts here may not perfectly match originals, for a variety of technical and practical reasons. Some abstacts are truncated for my purposes here, if they are particularly long-winded and unhelpful. I occasionally add clarifying notes. And I make some minor corrections.

There is no clear consensus in the literature concerning the terminology, aetiology and treatment for pain in the anterior part of the knee. The term 'anterior knee pain' is suggested to encompass all pain-related problems. By excluding anterior knee pain due to intra-articular pathology, peripatellar tendinitis or bursitis, plica syndromes, Sinding Larsen's disease, Osgood Schlatter's disease, neuromas and other rarely occurring pathologies, it is suggested that remaining patients with a clinical presentation of anterior knee pain could be diagnosed with patello-femoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Three major contributing factors of PFPS are discussed: (i) malalignment of the lower extremity and/or the patella; (ii) muscular imbalance of the lower extremity; and (iii) overactivity. The significance of lower extremity alignment factors and pathological limits needs further investigation.

It is possible that the definitions used for malalignment should be re-evaluated, as the scientific support is very weak for determining when alignment is normal and when there is malalignment. Consequently, pathological limits must be clarified, along with evaluation of risk factors for acquiring PFPS. Muscle tightness and muscular imbalance of the lower extremity muscles with decreased strength due to hypotrophy or inhibition have been suggested, but remain unclear as potential causes of PFPS. Decreased knee extensor strength is a common finding in patients with PFPS. Various patterns of weaknesses have been reported, with selective weakness in eccentric muscle strength, within the quadriceps muscle and in terminal knee extension. The significance of muscle function in a closed versus open kinetic chain has been discussed, but is far from well investigated. It is clear that further studies are necessary in order to establish the significance of various strength deficits and muscular imbalances, and to clarify whether a specific disturbance in muscular activation is a cause or an effect (or both) of PFPS.

The most common symptoms in patients with PFPS are pain during and after physical activity, during bodyweight loading of the lower extremities in walking up/down stairs and squatting, and in sitting with the knees flexed. However, the source of patellofemoral pain in patients with PFPS cannot be sufficiently explained. There are several types of clinical manifestation of pain, and therefore a differentiated documentation of the patient's pain symptoms is necessary. The connection between strength, pain and inhibition, as well as between personality and pain, needs further investigation.

Many different treatment protocols are described in the literature and recent studies advocate a comprehensive treatment approach allowing for an individual and specifically designed treatment. Surgical treatment is rarely indicated. It is strongly suggested that, when presenting studies on PFPS, a detailed description should be provided of the diagnosis, inclusion and exclusion criteria of the patients should be specified along with a detailed methodology, and the conclusions drawn should be compared with those of other studies in the published literature. As this is not the case in most studies on PFPS found in the literature, it is only possible to make general comparisons. In order to further develop treatment models for PFPS we advocate prospective, randomised, controlled, long term studies using validated outcome measures. However, there is a strong need for basic research on the nature and aetiology of PFPS in order to better understand this mysterious syndrome.

related content

This page is part of the PainScience BIBLIOGRAPHY, which contains plain language summaries of thousands of scientific papers & others sources. It’s like a highly specialized blog. A few highlights:

PainSci Member Login » Submit your email to unlock member content. If you can’t remember/access your registration email, please contact me. ~ Paul Ingraham, PainSci Publisher