Detailed guides to painful problems, treatments & more

Consensus at last! Long-term results of all randomized controlled trials show that fusion is no better than non-operative care in improving pain and disability in chronic low back pain

PainSci » bibliography » Mannion et al 2016
updated
Tags: surgery, back pain, bad news, spine, treatment, pain problems

Four pages on PainSci cite Mannion 2016: 1. The Complete Guide to Low Back Pain2. Complete Guide to Plantar Fasciitis3. Spinal Fracture Bracing and Fixation

PainSci commentary on Mannion 2016: ?This page is one of thousands in the PainScience.com bibliography. It is not a general article: it is focused on a single scientific paper, and it may provide only just enough context for the summary to make sense. Links to other papers and more general information are provided wherever possible.

Excellent and important commentary on Hedlund et al, which was an important long-term experiment comparing spinal fusion to physiotherapy over more than a decade. It seemed to produce a contradictory result that “prevents a strong conclusion.” But the waffling wasn’t necessary. That good-news-bad-news conclusion was a bit of an illusion. The authors cherry-picked the best possible sounding news from their own data, creating the appearance of uncertainty about spinal fusion where in fact there was none. Mannion, Brox, and Fairbank explain exactly why.

For full details, see Long term results of spinal fusion: good news and bad?

~ Paul Ingraham

related content

Specifically regarding Mannion 2016:

This page is part of the PainScience BIBLIOGRAPHY, which contains plain language summaries of thousands of scientific papers & others sources. It’s like a highly specialized blog. A few highlights:

PainSci Member Login » Submit your email to unlock member content. If you can’t remember/access your registration email, please contact me. ~ Paul Ingraham, PainSci Publisher