Detailed guides to painful problems, treatments & more

Is radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), sham-rESWT or a standardised exercise programme in combination with advice plus customised foot orthoses more effective than advice plus customised foot orthoses alone in the treatment of plantar fasciopathy? A double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial

PainSci » bibliography » Heide et al 2024
updated
Tags: devices, plantar fasciitis, treatment, foot, leg, limbs, pain problems, overuse injury, injury, tendinosis

Three pages on PainSci cite Heide 2024: 1. Does Ultrasound Therapy Work?2. Plentiful potent PEMF prevails (defying my cynical prediction)3. Shocking shockwave defeat

PainSci notes on Heide 2024:

This trial was designed to test the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) for plantar fasciitis, by comparing it to a sham, an exercise program, and just advice and orthoses). They recruited 200 patients and split them up into four groups, and checked on at the start and then after 3, 6, and 12 months. The shockwave group got three treatments.

There were “no statistically significant between-group differences,” so it was a wash: not only no measurable difference between real and fake shockwave therapy, but exercise, advice, and orthoses also all failed to be helpful. The authors concluded:

“In patients with plantar fasciopathy, there was no additional benefit of rESWT, sham-rESWT or a standardised exercise programme over advice plus customised foot orthoses in alleviating heel pain.”

original abstract Abstracts here may not perfectly match originals, for a variety of technical and practical reasons. Some abstacts are truncated for my purposes here, if they are particularly long-winded and unhelpful. I occasionally add clarifying notes. And I make some minor corrections.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), sham-rESWT or a standardised exercise programme in combination with advice plus customised foot orthoses is more effective than advice plus customised foot orthoses alone in alleviating heel pain in patients with plantar fasciopathy.

METHODS: 200 patients with plantar fasciopathy were included in a four-arm, parallel-group, sham-controlled, observer-blinded, partly patient-blinded trial. At baseline, before randomisation, all patients received advice plus customised foot orthoses. Patients were randomised to rESWT (n=50), *sham-rESWT* (n=50), exercise (n=50) or advice plus customised foot orthoses alone (n=50). Patients in the rESWT and sham-rESWT groups received three treatments. The exercise programme comprised two exercises performed three times a week for 12 weeks, including eight supervised sessions with a physiotherapist. Patients allocated to advice plus customised foot orthoses did not receive additional treatment. The primary outcome was change in heel pain during activity in the previous week per Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) from baseline to 6-month follow-up. The outcome was collected at baseline, and 3, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS: The primary analysis showed no statistically significant between-group differences in mean change in heel pain during activity for rESWT versus advice plus customised foot orthoses (-0.02, 95% CI -1.01 to 0.96), sham-rESWT versus advice plus customised foot orthoses (0.52, 95%CI -0.49 to 1.53) and exercise versus advice plus customised foot orthoses (-0.11, 95%CI -1.11 to 0.89) at 6 months.

CONCLUSION: In patients with plantar fasciopathy, there was no additional benefit of rESWT, sham-rESWT or a standardised exercise programme over advice plus customised foot orthoses in alleviating heel pain.

This page is part of the PainScience BIBLIOGRAPHY, which contains plain language summaries of thousands of scientific papers & others sources. It’s like a highly specialized blog. A few highlights:

PainSci Member Login » Submit your email to unlock member content. If you can’t remember/access your registration email, please contact me. ~ Paul Ingraham, PainSci Publisher