Detailed guides to painful problems, treatments & more

Should dyspareunia be retained as a sexual dysfunction in DSM-V? A painful classification decision

PainSci » bibliography » Binik 2005
updated

One article on PainSci cites Binik 2005: Vaginismus

original abstract Abstracts here may not perfectly match originals, for a variety of technical and practical reasons. Some abstacts are truncated for my purposes here, if they are particularly long-winded and unhelpful. I occasionally add clarifying notes. And I make some minor corrections.

The DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) classifies dyspareunia as a sexual dysfunction and describes it as a "sexual pain" disorder. This classification has been widely accepted with little controversy despite the absence of a theoretical rationale or supporting empirical data. An examination of the validity of this classification suggests that there is little current justification for the use of the term "sexual pain" or for considering dyspareunia a sexual dysfunction. Dyspareunia fits the current DSM-IV-TR classification criteria for pain disorder better than it fits those for sexual dysfunction. Empirical data from diagnostic, experimental, and therapy outcome studies support this conclusion. The reconceptualization of dyspareunia as a pain disorder rather than as a sexual dysfunction has important implications for the understanding and treatment of this prevalent but neglected women's health problem.

This page is part of the PainScience BIBLIOGRAPHY, which contains plain language summaries of thousands of scientific papers & others sources. It’s like a highly specialized blog. A few highlights: