Detailed guides to painful problems, treatments & more

Healing Usually Accelerates

The better you get, the faster you get better, a “delicious cycle” — but what if it doesn’t?

Paul Ingraham • 8m read

See, when it starts to fall apart,
man it really falls apart
Like boots or hearts oh when they start,
they really fall apart.

“Boots Or Hearts,” The Tragically Hip

If you’re recovering from a injury, I have some good news and some bad news. The bad news is that there’s probably nothing you can do to rush it. There are whole industries devoted to selling the hope of accelerated recovery, but few examples of it actually working.

So what’s the good news? Healing works amazingly well without much help. The prognosis for most painful problems is good. In fact, as things get better, you can usually count on getting better faster. You can’t rush it, but healing speeds up on its own.

In fact, this is exactly why many products and therapies promising to accelerate healing seem to work: because they are often applied right around the time that healing is picking up speed anyway.1

Positive feedback: the good, the bad, and the ugly

“Positive feedback” is usually negative. It’s what causes public address systems to squeal. It powers public hysterias and riots. It’s how droughts get worse. Positive feedback is a vicious cycle:

The worse something gets, the faster it gets worse.2

But there are several positive feedback loops in biology that are actually positive.

And there’s another kind of happy positive feedback cycle: the positive feedback loop that usually occurs in the later stages of healing from injury and pain problems.

Positive feedback in healing and recovery

Poor health is often defined by a downward spiral, like the way a broken hip late in life often leads to rapidly declining vitality. But if it’s not a downward spiral, it’s an upward spiral: if healing progresses, it tends to produce positive feedback. Its progress improves conditions for more progress. Healing accelerates. Examples:

There are many such examples, and they really add up. Here’s a trickier one …

Pain and sensitization (when it’s working properly)

Pain tends to cause more pain: that is, the experience of pain often sensitizes us, so that we experience more pain too easily — particularly vicious cycle; sensitization can be a terrible trap.

Fortunately, most vicious cycles eventually fizzle out. The sensitization process, when it does occur, routinely reverses itself in normal healing.

Pain is often weirdly out of proportion to injury at first — think about stubbed toes — but as we recover the nervous system reduces the alarm and stops “warning” us about injured tissue long before it’s actually done healing. The alarm stops because the brain is confident that there’s no danger. And so pain reduction usually speeds ahead of tissue recovery.

And what if the delicious cycle doesn’t happen?

Where’s my upward spiral?! Obviously, healing doesn’t always go well and accelerate! This website is mostly devoted to problems to injuries that don’t heal, to pain that keeps going on (and on and on). If most healing accelerates, then what’s going on when an eight-month old injury is still driving you nuts?

Strictly speaking, it’s probably not an “injury” — maybe never was, or it changed.

We can assume that a garden variety injury should heal steadily and then quickly, if given half a chance. If that does not happen, it’s valuable diagnostic information — something is not what it seems. You’re probably not just dealing with simple damaged tissue any more. So what are the other possibilities? In broad strokes:

Photo of an large hourglass with blue sand, isolated on white, representing healing time.




If most healing accelerates, then what’s going on when an eight-month old injury is still driving you nuts?

When “injuries” don’t involve traumatized tissue, per se

People often think they are “injured” when they aren’t. The classic example is back pain: its bark is worse than its bite. People are often convinced that they have damaged their back when there’s no detectable tissue trauma or lesion of any kind.3 It’s one of the most studied phenomena in all of chronic pain science.

Another example: the condition of frozen shoulder often begins with painful limitation of shoulder movement, and patients often assume that they have wounded themselves somehow. But this condition is more like a passing wave of disease than an injury: a strange seizing up of the shoulder joint that is biological in character, not traumatic.

Muscle pain can develop with ferocious speed. The victim assumes that they’ve damaged something, but the most meticulous investigation would never reveal anything but soft tissue that’s extremely sensitive to pressure: the phenomenon known as “trigger points.”

Out of the frying pan, into the fire

Tissue heals, but pain is another matter. Pain is weird. In theory, pain should fade as injuries heal. In practice, pain often carries on long after tissue has healed.

The mechanism for this is probably the formation of trigger points and/or sensitization in the aftermath of injury. (It’s not clear that trigger points are distinct from sensitization. So-called muscle pain may just be a common manifestation of sensitization.4)

Trigger points again: The persistence may be due to subtle lesions in muscle tissue. These can also form in reaction to more obvious tissue trauma — and then they just take over, like very rude house guests that simply will not leave. It is surprising the degree to which trigger points can essentially replace the pain of injury, taking over the job of making you miserable even as the tissue otherwise recovers.

But the pain itself can go on the fritz, like a car alarm set off by the slightest vibration.

Sensitization: I mentioned it above as a normal part of healing. How it goes chronic is largely a mystery, but even surprisingly minor traumas can set it in motion, and of course stress and anxiety are likely factors, but perhaps many other medical factors as well. Sensitization is one of the main reasons that pain is not only weird, but sometimes a disease process in its own right: that is, you don’t have pain because of some other problem that is painful, but rather your problem is that you have pain, full stop. See Pain is Weird: Pain science reveals a volatile, misleading sensation that comes entirely from an overprotective brain, not our tissues.

About Paul Ingraham

Headshot of Paul Ingraham, short hair, neat beard, suit jacket.

I am a science writer in Vancouver, Canada. I was a Registered Massage Therapist for a decade and the assistant editor of ScienceBasedMedicine.org for several years. I’ve had many injuries as a runner and ultimate player, and I’ve been a chronic pain patient myself since 2015. Full bio. See you on Facebook or Twitter., or subscribe:

Notes

  1. Most problems eventually resolve on their own, often right around the same time we’re getting desperate and trying long-shot cures — the Darkest Before Dawn Effect. The snake oil gets the credit instead of natural healing. The natural acceleration of normal healing can exaggerate this effect quite a bit, if the timing is right.
  2. More technically defined, from Wikipedia: “Positive feedback is a process that occurs in a feedback loop in which the effects of a small disturbance on a system include an increase in the magnitude of the perturbation. That is, A produces more of B which in turn produces more of A.”
  3. Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, et al. Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;36(4):811–6. PubMed 25430861 ❐ PainSci Bibliography 53872 ❐ “Imaging findings of spine degeneration are present in high proportions of asymptomatic individuals, increasing with age. Many imaging-based degenerative features are likely part of normal aging and unassociated with pain.” This is just one good sample of the science available on this theme.
  4. People experience muscle pain and acutely sensitive spots in muscle tissue that we call “muscle knots.” What’s going on? The dominant theory is that a trigger point is an isolated spasm of a small patch of muscle tissue. Unfortunately, it’s just a theory, trigger point science is half-baked and controversial, and it’s not even clear that trigger points are even a problem with muscle. Meanwhile, people keep hurting, and massage — especially self-massage — is a safe, cheap, reasonable way to try to help. That’s why I have a large tutorial devoted to how to self-treat “trigger points” — whatever they really are. See Trigger Point Doubts: Do muscle knots exist? Exploring controversies about the existence and nature of so-called “trigger points” and myofascial pain syndrome.

Permalinks

https://www.painscience.com/articles/healing-usually-accelerates.php

PainScience.com/healing_accelerates
PainScience.com/healing_acceleration

linking guide

article size L (1,800 words)

PainSci Member Login » Submit your email to unlock member content. If you can’t remember/access your registration email, please contact me. ~ Paul Ingraham, PainSci Publisher